Every city needlessly hates on the national media, but it feels like Bears fans are going to blow a fuse if another prominent NFL writer comes out and rains on Ryan Pace’s expensive parade. The latest? ESPN’s Bill Barnwell, who weighed in on the recent Nick Foles trade in a column on Wednesday afternoon. You can read the entire thing right here, though he hits on the trade right from the top. In particular, it’s the contract that Barnwell takes issues with:
There’s nobody else on a veteran contract like this in football. Foles has most of his third year guaranteed, and when players get three guaranteed seasons, they’re usually being paid like superstars. Borderline starters like Foles rarely get more than one guaranteed year on their deals. He is essentially guaranteed to get top-level backup money for two years and what will be mid-tier backup money in the third. That’s not necessarily a bad deal in itself and it’s much more in line with Foles’ established level of play than his prior deal.
He gives the Bears a C- for the deal, which isn’t outrageous as much as it’s the latest in an endless line of reminders what teams have to deal with when they get their QB evaluations wrong. The real kicker is giving the Jaguars an A- for «getting out of the Foles pickle.» As for the blockbuster quarterback competition coming to Lake Forrest at some point in the future, Barnwell suspects that «the Bears still badly want Trubisky to win the job and traded for a quarterback who was just good enough to push him without being good enough to clearly push him aside.» An exciting time to be a Bears fan!
And if you think that’s bad, you can probaly just skip over Barnwell’s evaluation of the Jimmy Graham signing. Just keep reminding yourself that that C’s do actually get degrees, or even concentrate on the B’s he gave to the Robert Quinn and Germain Ifedi deals. Just don’t read the Jimmy Graham blurb.
Bears lost the Nick Foles trade according to one prominent NFL writer originally appeared on NBC Sports Chicago